LEXIS®-NEXIS® Academic Universe - Document
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return to Search][Focus]
Search Terms: nativity scene, public

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 3 of 5. [Next Document]

Copyright 1998 Newsweek  
Newsweek

December 21, 1998, U.S. Edition

SECTION: THE LAST WORD; Pg. 78

LENGTH: 1566 words

HEADLINE: SEASONAL LITIGATION

BYLINE: BY GEORGE F. WILL

HIGHLIGHT:
Is a religious sensibility natural to humanity, or is religion akin to secondhand smoke?

BODY:
   FOR MANY PEOPLE, 'TIS THE SEASON WHEN (IN THE words of the Jesuit poet Gerard Manley Hopkins) "the world is charged with the grandeur of God." For the American Civil Liberties Union and similarly militant secularists, December is charged with menace, in the form of creches and other religious displays on public properties. The secularists think such symbols are the thin end of the wedge of theocracy, harbingers of an unconstitutional "establishment" of religion.

Jersey City, N.J., is America's most ethnically diverse city, but that is not why it is ground zero in the creche wars. On the contrary, its diverse citizens like Mayor Bret Schundler's way of devising diverse rituals to honor the city's ethnicities. It is the ACLU that wants courts to impose a monochrome barrenness on the public square. The ACLU, which has inexhaustible reservoirs of indignation, is offended by menorahs as well as nativity scenes.

The ACLU's litigation against Jersey City, now in its fourth year, grinds on against a background of decades of judicial hairsplitting, the purpose of which is to prevent "establishment." For example, courts have held that nativity scenes, to be constitutional, must be leavened, or diluted, by the inclusion of a quantity of secular symbols -- Frostys and Rudolphs and the like. But the potential for litigation is limitless.

Attorneys with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is defending Jersey City pro bono, asked one of the city's tormentors if he would object to the city's displaying Pakistan's flag, which has a star and crescent. "I may well," he said, noting darkly that "Islam" appears in the name of Pakistan's capital. "This gives rise to certain problems." If so, what of Norway's flag? It contains a cross (as do many other flags, including Great Britain's, which has three crosses -- those of saints Andrew, George and Patrick). Israel's flag has the star of David. More menace. Regarding Christmas, one plaintiff said that a seasonal celebration neutral enough to be constitutional would observe the winter solstice. Another plaintiff thought wreaths were constitutional -- until he was told that wreaths began as reminders of Jesus' crown of thorns. By the way, candy canes represent shepherds' crooks. The specter of "establishment" is everywhere.

And not just in Jersey City. In San Diego . . . (Uh-oh. Does even the city's name -- and the names of St. Louis, San Francisco, St. Petersburg, St. Augustine and many more cities, including, come to think of it, Los Angeles -- pass constitutional muster? Does a religious name on an American public place violate the Establishment Clause?)

In San Diego, a religious group bought bus shelter advertisements and billboard space for pictures of a wrapped present accompanied by messages such as "A gift to die for. Jesus did" and "The gift that keeps on forgiving. Jesus." Transit officials received a few complaints, so the ads were removed. The company said its policy is neutrality -- not to promote one religion over another. By being banned, religious messages are treated like political ads, sexually salacious ads and ads for tobacco, alcohol and guns.

In San Francisco's Sunnydale public housing complex, residents are allowed to use the community room for many activities, such as parties and outside speakers (including those from the Nation of Islam), but not for Bible study. The city's Housing Authority says the principle of separation of church and state precludes using "federally funded units to promote interests in the church."

In Gilbert, Ariz., the ACLU got a court to issue a restraining order to prevent the mayor from declaring a "Bible Week." When the mayor criticized this, the ACLU, that self-styled friend of the First Amendment, criticized her for engaging in government-disapproved speech, because the order prohibited her from lending any support to "Bible Week."

In Medford, N.J., a 6-year-old was invited to pick a story to read to his fellow first graders. He picked two paragraphs from Genesis in his Beginners Bible. The passage about the reconciliation of the brothers Jacob and Esau mentions neither God nor miracles. Still, the boy was forbidden to read it. His mother says the teacher said: "It's a public school and the Bible is not allowed."

In Cincinnati a suit is challenging the constitutionality of 5 U.S.C. Section 6103. What does that law do? It recognizes Christmas as a federal holiday. (After 29 years of hostility, Cuba's Communist Party has restored Christmas as a holiday.)

So, business is brisk for groups like the Becket Fund. Located in Washington, the Fund litigates in defense of religious expression. It aims to prevent religion from being required to render unto Caesar more subservience than is required by the First Amendment's prohibition of "establishment" of religion, and to see that Caesar renders unto religion the respect mandated by the guarantee of the "free exercise" of religion.

The Fund's president, Kevin Hasson, aims to be as much an affliction to religion's despisers as the Fund's namesake, Thomas Becket, that famously turbulent priest, was to Henry II. Hasson believes that supporters of religion are litigating in self-defense, not to achieve privileges but to avoid stigmatization, marginalization and other imposed disadvantages. At issue are two clashing theories about human nature.

On one side, Hasson says, are those who believe that human beings have a natural thirst for transcendence, a built-in desire to live in communities enriched by rituals that express and slake that thirst. In the argot of the day, human beings are hard-wired with religious sensibilities. On the other side are those who believe that the religious impulse is a bad habit, a legacy of less enlightened times, and something that society should outgrow. Religion is akin to secondhand smoke -- something that thoroughly enlightened, modern people find obnoxious, and from which the public must be protected.

The seasonal litigation may sometimes turn on minutiae. But the stake -- our conception of ourselves -- could not be bigger.

GRAPHIC: Picture, no caption

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: December 26, 1998




[Previous Document] Document 3 of 5. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: nativity scene, public
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2000, LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.